Explanation: Each team is listed with its record, overall score differential, and its ratings. Brief explanations of the ratings follow.
• Schedule The number in this column is the effective opponent strength of a team. In other words, they would be expected to have the same record had they played all games against an opponent of this predictive rating at a neutral site. Because this calculation depends on the strength of the team in question, it is not possible to rank schedules using these values.
• Expected Losses For college teams, this number is the number of losses an average ranked (top 15 hockey; otherwise top 25) team would be expected to have against the team's schedule. For pro teams, this is the number of losses an average team would be expected to have against the team's schedule. Unlike the schedule ranking, this value can be used to rank schedules.
• Standard Ranks teams in an order such that a team is "probably better" than all teams ranked lower than it. This calculation uses margin of victory only for computing a team's opponents strengths; the team's rating itself is computed using only wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule
• Median Likelihood Determines the likely ratings for each team, based on its wins, losses, and ties relative to its schedule. This generally produces the same or similar ratings as the standard ranking.
• Predictive Both schedule strength and rating vs. schedule strength are determined considering both the wins and losses and the score differentials. This rating contains none of the biases in the standard rating, but does weight recent games slightly more than past games since those are a better indication of the team's current strength. This rating is the best of the first three for seeing how good teams are, and thus is the best for predicting future results.
• Improved RPI Rating The improved RPI formula is similar to the standard RPI, except that the schedule strength is carried out to infinite depth instead of ending with opponents' opponents, thus allows for a better comparison of isolated groups of teams than is given by the standard RPI calculation. It is similar to the simple rating, except that all games are given equal weight.
• Predictive-Scoring. This value indicates how many points a team would be expected to score if it played an identical team.
• Predictive-Offense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team scores. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to score the league average number of points. This does not necessarily rate a team's offensive abilities, as a fast pace in basketball or big-play defense in football can make a team score more points.
• Predictive-Defense. This combines the predictive and scoring ratings to measure how many points a team allows. The number is the predictive rating of an opponent against whom the team would be expected to allow the league average number of points. The same caveat in the predictive-offense rating applies here.
• Home Scoring. This is an adjustment to the scoring ranking applied at home. Values are nonzero only for baseball, where park effects can be significant.
In order to increase early-season stability, the three main rankings, the improved RPI, and the college pseudopoll include priors based on the previous season final predictive ratings and occasionally incorporating preseason predictions of various major publications. The other rankings for college sports do not include priors, and thus can be wildly unstable early in the year. A team whose rankings are affected by this prior is noted with a P following its rankings.

## Full Ranking

``````                                           STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI
TEAM         W  L  T PF PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  P-SCR  P-OFF  P-DEF  H-SCR
D.C.        16  8 11 54 40 -0.010 17.137    1  0.011    1  0.026    1  0.037    1 0.5246  0.374  0.144 -0.070  0.000
NEW ENGLAND 13  9 13 42 38  0.032 17.853    2  0.010    2  0.018    2  0.015    2 0.5158 -0.012 -0.176  0.206  0.000
HOUSTON     13  9 14 51 44 -0.030 17.508    3  0.009    3  0.010    4  0.007    3 0.5106  0.261  0.021 -0.007  0.000
DALLAS      16 13  4 49 46 -0.013 16.290    4  0.008    4  0.009    5  0.005    4 0.5103  0.429  0.160 -0.151  0.000
CHICAGO     14 11  8 43 40 -0.009 16.308    5  0.007    5  0.008    3  0.011    5 0.5088  0.241  0.008  0.013  0.000
CHIVAS USA  11 10 13 47 45 -0.011 16.808    6  0.006    6 -0.002    6  0.004    6 0.5031  0.298  0.048 -0.040  0.000
NEW YORK     9 12 13 42 43  0.021 17.321    7  0.005    7 -0.010    7 -0.006    7 0.4912  0.184 -0.053  0.041  0.000
COLORADO    12 15  8 41 56  0.001 17.701    8  0.004    8 -0.014   12 -0.035    8 0.4905  0.341  0.045 -0.115  0.000
LOS ANGELES 11 14  6 37 36 -0.007 15.448    9  0.003    9 -0.016    8 -0.007    9 0.4889  0.016 -0.179  0.165  0.000
SALT LAKE   10 13  9 45 49 -0.008 15.997   10  0.002   10 -0.017   10 -0.019   10 0.4888  0.497  0.196 -0.234  0.000
TEAM         W  L  T PF PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  P-SCR  P-OFF  P-DEF  H-SCR
KANSAS CITY  9 14  8 40 44  0.026 15.892   11  0.001   11 -0.020    9 -0.012   11 0.4834  0.355  0.079 -0.104  0.000
COLUMBUS     8 14  9 29 39  0.011 15.812   12  0.000   12 -0.025   11 -0.031   12 0.4779 -0.079 -0.268  0.206  0.000
``````

``````WESTERN CONFERENCE
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI
TEAM         W  L  T PF PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  P-SCR  P-OFF  P-DEF  H-SCR
HOUSTON     13  9 14 51 44 -0.030 17.508    3  0.009    3  0.010    4  0.007    3 0.5106  0.261  0.021 -0.007  0.000
DALLAS      16 13  4 49 46 -0.013 16.290    4  0.008    4  0.009    5  0.005    4 0.5103  0.429  0.160 -0.151  0.000
CHIVAS USA  11 10 13 47 45 -0.011 16.808    6  0.006    6 -0.002    6  0.004    6 0.5031  0.298  0.048 -0.040  0.000
COLORADO    12 15  8 41 56  0.001 17.701    8  0.004    8 -0.014   12 -0.035    8 0.4905  0.341  0.045 -0.115  0.000
LOS ANGELES 11 14  6 37 36 -0.007 15.448    9  0.003    9 -0.016    8 -0.007    9 0.4889  0.016 -0.179  0.165  0.000
SALT LAKE   10 13  9 45 49 -0.008 15.997   10  0.002   10 -0.017   10 -0.019   10 0.4888  0.497  0.196 -0.234  0.000
``````

``````EASTERN CONFERENCE
STANDARD   MED LIKELY  PREDICTIVE  IMPRVD RPI
TEAM         W  L  T PF PA  SCHED  ELOSS  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  RNK RATING  P-SCR  P-OFF  P-DEF  H-SCR
D.C.        16  8 11 54 40 -0.010 17.137    1  0.011    1  0.026    1  0.037    1 0.5246  0.374  0.144 -0.070  0.000
NEW ENGLAND 13  9 13 42 38  0.032 17.853    2  0.010    2  0.018    2  0.015    2 0.5158 -0.012 -0.176  0.206  0.000
CHICAGO     14 11  8 43 40 -0.009 16.308    5  0.007    5  0.008    3  0.011    5 0.5088  0.241  0.008  0.013  0.000
NEW YORK     9 12 13 42 43  0.021 17.321    7  0.005    7 -0.010    7 -0.006    7 0.4912  0.184 -0.053  0.041  0.000
KANSAS CITY  9 14  8 40 44  0.026 15.892   11  0.001   11 -0.020    9 -0.012   11 0.4834  0.355  0.079 -0.104  0.000
COLUMBUS     8 14  9 29 39  0.011 15.812   12  0.000   12 -0.025   11 -0.031   12 0.4779 -0.079 -0.268  0.206  0.000
``````

``````DIVISION            W  L  T   PCT  RNK RATING
EASTERN CONFERENCE 69 68 62 0.503    1  0.027
WESTERN CONFERENCE 73 74 54 0.498    2 -0.033
``````

``````Home field advantage amounts to:
0.291 points in main ratings (0.205 for semineutral)
0.030 points in improved RPI (0.020 for semineutral)
Average of 1.00 points per score
``````
```Predict score: CHICAGO CHIVAS USA COLORADO COLUMBUS D.C. DALLAS HOUSTON KANSAS CITY LOS ANGELES NEW ENGLAND NEW YORK SALT LAKE vs. hosting at CHICAGO CHIVAS USA COLORADO COLUMBUS D.C. DALLAS HOUSTON KANSAS CITY LOS ANGELES NEW ENGLAND NEW YORK SALT LAKE Team Strength vs. Time Plot: CHICAGO CHIVAS USA COLORADO COLUMBUS D.C. DALLAS HOUSTON KANSAS CITY LOS ANGELES NEW ENGLAND NEW YORK SALT LAKE posted: Mon Dec 31 14:18:22 2007 games through: Sun Nov 12 2006 ```

Back to Dolphin rankings main page.